Moreover, solutions are never complete. Meaning that there is no solution to a problem that would eliminate this problem completely. Bushman culture traits were shown in the film through the way people of the tribe acted and lived. For example, people of the Calahari tribe used words that represented different symbols for different words in there language.
Moreover, they lived in small numbers, a maximum of 50, and they kept roaming, searching for food in different places. They lived in small cottages and they depended on nature for their living. In addition, we can notice that bushman culture is a complete opposite of the culture in the United States.
Second of all, people of the Calahari use a language that includes symbols to refer to things they want to explain, while in the United States people are likely to use letters that form words to express certain ideas. Finally, I look at this film and find it a meaningful and interesting film because it leads to good themes in a comic way. Moreover, I find it useful in a Human Geography class because it makes a good comparison between modern and old cultures and shows how an old culture without advances in technology can retain a more peaceful and resentful life.
The Gods Must Be Crazy. Accessed September 15, Leave your email and we will send you an example after 24 hours If you contact us after hours, we'll get back to you in 24 hours or less.
How to cite this page Choose cite format: How about make it original? Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. Here, people are contented with the available resources and no one acts superior to the other. Everybody is equal, and no one can claim more influence on the other. It is for this reason that conflicts and dissatisfactions are rear in the bush setting. Life is easy and every day comes and goes normally without many unnecessary bureaucracies that lead to the complexity in life.
The central theme of symbolic interactions is that the surrounding influences humanity and images naturally found in their environments. Symbols are traditionally consequential social characteristics that are similar and emerge from social relations. Authenticity of life is a direct result of social interactions and is accrued from symbolic relations. The physical environment is also significant to human behavior and characteristics as it is mainly inferred in symbolic systems.
A definition, attached to historical practices or traditional prospects, can change appreciably and significantly as interactions are realized. Social blocks are mainly interested in presenting their cultural beliefs as favorable, than the rest protecting their esteemed inimitability. Thinking is an intrinsic self-evaluation that develops as social interactions intensify.
Preferences are unique to different individuals and are achieved under the influence of the setting in the diverse social circumstances. From these descriptions, the view of human behavior emanates both in collective and individual situation presented as dynamic and inventive opposed to being alert to environmental inducements.
From this perception, global ethnic diversity is formed as a cultural mixture with diverse cultures that are clearly surrounded with strict confines between them. This is the perspective in which our portrayal of culture is formed. Different beliefs and cultural practices host their own characteristics that make them unique and distinctive from each other. A society can be either identical or decidedly different. Concerning the question of globalizing culture with ethnic diversity, the conflict point of view is that globalization poses a significant threat to the original and existing cultures.
The view is conveyed to the population through the global economic structures. In political and economic guise, they have infiltrated these nations with their own cultural beliefs eroding the existing and native beliefs of the indigenous population. This argument does converge to the cultural differentials dispute in respect to perspective disapproval or neglect of culture diversity. It rather emphasizes functionalist principles that show the differences between cultures and the result of globalization.
In the inland, the Bushmen lack organizations of tenure and are seen as a faultless society with no instances of violence, hate and other societal vices that cause human conflicts. The land provides them with all these sources of joy hence there are no reasons to have dull days.
They also have no guiding laws and regulations neither do they administer punishment since there are no laws to break. Speaking about the development status in the city and the hustles and struggles to make a living and survive in such a harsh environment, people still make a livelihood out of what they have. People in the cities seem to have their lives going on well and have no complains about the setup they are forced to live in. The daily challenges facing the civilized population remain conquered every single day, and they seem to have adapted to the way of life goffered by the consequential technological advancement.
The Bushmen find contentment with the slow pacing lifestyle and are adapted to it. Just the same way the urban population marvels at their existence, the Bushmen too remain intrigued by the urban dwellers. A bottle falling from the skies is something that must be of supernatural influence. The Bushmen could not understand how an object made from heavy metal can fly above in the wind without falling. This was supernatural and almost unexplainable to them. Their lives were easy, and they attributed everything that happened to them as to the gods.
Nothing happened to them without the knowledge of the gods. With these two distinctive settings, one lesson is quite clear in both situations. Humanity is a creation of the surrounding that one adapts.
Different environments result in different characteristics and different cultures altogether. With the differences in cultural practices, the human race is bound to co-exist without conflicts.
We all have different backgrounds in terms of growth, and addictiveness, but we share the same human characteristics. This would bring cordial relation and would halt possible conflicts in regards to desire of influence.
The Gods Must be Crazy essays As the Bushmen are portrayed in the film, they are a simple and quite non-materialistic culture that lives off the land, gathering plants and hunting for their food and the survival of the entire tribe. They enjoy each other, and do not feel any need for outsid.
“The Gods Must Be Crazy” This film tries to send a message on how globalization can negatively affect a culture such as the Sho tribe of the Kalahari Desert.
Sample of The Gods Must Be Crazy Essay (you can also order custom written The Gods Must Be Crazy essay). Essays - largest database of quality sample essays and research papers on The Gods Must Be Crazy.
The movie ” The Gods Must Be Crazy ” describes a tribe from the people of the Calahari, a place in Africa, coming in contact with a coke bottle dropped from a plane. The movie of the Gods must be crazy shows a blunt distinction among the cultures of the Bushmen and modern societies within communications amongst members from two very different cultures.