A commercial and industrial boom like nothing the country had imagined before took place. During the first year, to be sure, times were hard: But recovery was rapid; the Federal government was spending as much money that no depression could endure, and by the summer of the northern states were waist-deep in property.
This increased demand northern farms met with effortless ease. There might have been a crippling manpower shortage, because patriotic fervor nowhere ran stronger than in the farm belt and a high percentage of the able-bodied men had gone into the army.
But the War came precisely when the industrial revolution was marking itself on the farm. Until farm labor had been abundant and cheap, and these machines made there way slowly; now farm labor was scarce and high-priced, and the farmer who turned to machinery could actually expand his acreage and his production with fewer hands.
Although, it is probable that Civil War pushed the North into industrial age a full generation sooner than would otherwise have been the case. It was just ready to embrace the factory system in , but without the war its development would have gone more slowly.
The war provided a forced draft that accelerated the process enormously. By the northeastern portion of American had development compressed into four feverish years. In the long run it would have been far cheaper to purchase the abolition of slavery, although such a course was unthinkable to both sides in This was three to four times the total estimated value of slave in the Confederacy.
Both sides resorted to many similar financial measures: The overriding desire for victory led to sweeping measures on the South. Some affected the master-slave relationship. Southern slaveholders had defended their right to absolute control over their bondsmen in antebellum days.
When war came, they watched helplessly as the Confederate government and Southern states governments transferred hundreds of thousands of slaves from private plantations to more urgent labor in the war effort. Slaves even become Confederate soldiers shortly before Appomattox. And throughout the war Southerners relaxed their close supervision of slave movements and activities.
Normal political life also came to a halt in the South during the war. There was no two-party system as in the North. They spoke their minds freely. Yet the demands of fighting a separatist revolt prevented any change in government. The war not only changed master-slave relations and Southern politics.
It also altered the southern economy. These men were determined to assume every power they needed to wage war. The Confederacy did more than seize slaves for war work. It closely regulated foreign commerce. It confiscated food and equipment from private farms for the army. It created government-run industries to produced military equipments.
And it tightly controlled what was left of the private enterprise. Southern economic devastation by could be measured in many ways. Cotton crops were destroyed or rotted unpacked in the fields.
Few factories remained in operation. There was almost no trade. Only a handful of banks were left, and they were nearly empty. At the time, the nation was composed of. This attitude toward southerners can even be found in the presidency of Abraham Lincoln evidenced in his inaugural address:.
That there are persons in one section or another who seek to destroy the Union at all events, and are glad of any pretext to do it, I will neither affirm nor deny; but if there be such, I need address no word to them. To those, however, who really love the Union may I not speak?
When Lincoln dismissed secessionists outright, he strengthened the Northern sectionalist perspective, but simultaneously fuels a burning resentment among the southerners. The provocation of regional rivalries caused by a mounting tendency towards egocentric sectionalism created conditions that were ripe for the rise of nationalist movements.
Lee Benson argues that Southern Nationalism had been on the rise since the s, and gained in popularity after the nullification crisis ended in Inferring from the pattern identified by Benson — where Southern Nationalism grows with each slight by Northern politicians - we can infer that Southern Nationalism was a reciprocal response to acts taken by Northerners.
As a result, as the gap in understandings of political legitimacy and personhood between the North and the South grew, so did the Southern Nationalist movement — and thus the risk for conflict. Egocentric sectionalism and the rise of Southern Nationalism, compounded by increasingly poor race relations , were key factors in creating the conditions whereby a civil war could occur — a notion supported by evidence from key political figures at the time, such as Lincoln and Stephens.
These two sociopolitical phenomena seem to have fed back into each other, whereby the exposure of regional difference incited the growth of Southern Nationalism, which in turn represented an exacerbation of provincial differences.
These developments led to what appeared to be an irresolvable struggle over political power between the North and South, resulting in the American Civil War. Lincoln, Abraham, and Rachel Seidman. A History in Documents. This blog post is provided free of charge and we encourage you to use it for your research and writing. The thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth amendments were proposed and passed within five years of the Civil Wars conclusion.
These amendments were to create. There were many causes for the American civil war. Some causes were underlying and some were immediate but all were vital in the cause for the American civil war.
The differences in the lifestyles between the north and the south were an underlying cause. The south had an economy that was based almost entirely on agriculture. The north on the other hand was an economy almost solely dependent on ind. During the American Civil War, which lasted from , over , accounted soldiers were killed.
Known as the "the first modern war", historians generally agree that the reason for this was because this was a time of transition for the military. Armies and Navies were still using tactics where they would gather large forces of firepower to bear on the enemy.
At the same time, weapons were. It was a war of division. It was brother against brother; north against south; and person against person fighting that left a heritage of grief and bitterness that in part still remains to this day. It was a great turning point in American history. It abolished slavery completely in the Uni. Was the Civil War an inevitable conflict?
The Civil War was an inevitable conflict that was bound to explode due to the differences between the North and South societies, slavery, and politics.
Nov 20, · Essay on The Civil War and Reconstruction. The Civil War was the turning point in the US history, while the Reconstruction era has completed the achievements of the Civil War and changes launched by the war/5(10).
- History of The American Civil War The Civil War was a brutal war between the North and South of America over the issue of slavery, which was spurred on by the secession of the southern states from .
Experiences of the American Civil War (): Honor, Duty and Death Introduction The following pages are an essay on the cause of the American Civil War () and the effects that the war had upon the soldiers, women and African Americans of the North and the South. Civil War Essay The Civil War was the most divisive war in American history. In the early s, the United States experienced a growth of nationalism and unity, but .
The Impact of the American Civil War on the Rights and Lives of Black in the U.S. Free essays, free sample essays and free example essays on Civil War topics are plagiarized. Order a custom written essay at ggetlava.cf now: ggetlava.cf is professional essay writing service which is committed to write great-quality custom essays, term papers, thesis papers, research papers, dissertations on any essay topics.