It turns out that those who do not die quickly die without dignity. Secondly, suicide with the help destroys the appointment of medical institutions: If a person who does not have depression can not claim to be in a position to die. As for a person with depression, the state actually confirms that life with depression is less valuable. Fourthly, euthanasia requires that the state and medical institutions determine whether a person should live.
As a result, people with disabilities become second-class people, because their lives are less valuable than people without disabilities. Parents of disabled children in Belgium are advised to expose children to euthanasia. Just as abortion justifies the killing of unborn children with Down syndrome and other abnormalities, euthanasia is used to kill already-born people, but less sophisticated than others.
Fifthly, suicide with assistance erases borders. If someone has a mental illness and has the right to use a suicide hotline, which is funded by the government, there is a stumbling block what doctors should do. The question is to deny a man from death or not. Then, it ups in the mind whether such pressure will be a violation of the new rights of citizens in a state where the government permits murder or not.
After all, once they decided that the woman had the right to abort, people immediately began to blame those who tried to discourage women from abortion, in violation of their rights.
Eightly, suicide for assistance creates a new, fictitious right, the right to death. It undermines the right to life, which can not be abandoned, even voluntarily. The right to death is a legal absurdity. Providing the state and courts with the right to legalize murder is an extremely dangerous step that has far-reaching consequences. Next to the facts, to provide medical professionals with the legal right to kill, even in limited circumstances, are unreasonable and dangerous.
Using this right, people can hide medical negligence or ill treatment. Such precedents have already been in European countries, where euthanasia is legalized. The eleventh against proclaims that children can push their parents so that they take advantage of the new service. Such cases were recorded in the United States and Europe. The twelfth fact explains that those who advocate the legalization of euthanasia ignore the fact that people may be under pressure and use this service for various reasons.
As a thirteenth against, there is a point that there is little discussion about how the final stage of euthanasia should be carried out. So-called precautionary measures have been illusory or ineffective in all jurisdictions where euthanasia is legalized.
It is known that many feel great relief if their suicide attempt was unsuccessful, but anyone can not question the victims of euthanasia or regret their decision. Moreover, suicide for assistance is based on a secular principle. After death, nothing is possible; suicide does not affect anything. It is very arrogant. If, as Christians believe and practically all of Western civilization up until recently , life after death exists, suicide is an act with enormous moral consequences.
Also, suicide for assistance as a moral issue has never been discussed, even on the periphery. The sixteenth against proclaims that abuse of euthanasia occurs wherever it is legal. For example, judges in the Netherlands have allowed some families to subject their elderly parents with dementia to euthanasia, despite the fact that the parents themselves have never asked for euthanasia and there was no weighty evidence that they wanted to die.
Nevertheless, the elderly person reflects and decides independently. What is more, their close people and relatives are trying to resist the choice of a person to commit suicide. It is worthy to note that older people are much better informed, more autonomous and self-confident than before and called for not underestimating the experience and qualifications of those who help to get out of life. Also, in countries, where legalization of euthanasia exists, the prices for this service increase.
In Belgium and the Netherlands every year, a huge number of people die as a result of euthanasia. Jewish and Christian thinkers opposed suicide as contradictory with the good of mankind and the responsibilities to God. For almost years or even more than that, the American common law practices punished the people who assisted others in suicide. However, that changed in the late nineteenth century when euthanasia acquired its modern connotation.
In 19th century people of America considered euthanasia and assisted suicide as rebellion against God's will. By s euthanasia was not a secret anymore, newspaper published the stories about it and motion picture also released a movie on the topic. Dispute against mercy killing caught fire in s and these years proved to be essential juncture in the history of euthanasia in America.
The euthanasia dispute was not only growing roots on the side of the Atlantic, but it also had a contradictory impact in Britain. A bill to legalize euthanasia was also kept before the British House of Lords in , but it was rejected. Many people, institutions and NGOs have tried to legalize euthanasia and assisted suicide but they have failed in their attempt. These failures happened because of the ethical values in every society, people in every society view ethics as important as anything else.
Assisted suicide is the most discussed topic in medical ethics and is widely contradicted. In Netherlands after years of controversial debate euthanasia and assisted suicide were legalized. Approximately people die in Netherlands and of them spend their last stage on life supporting machines. So the commission sat to analyze if the dose of morphine should be increased or assist in suicide or actually kill the patient. This is a flight from the challenge of social compassion.
The issue of euthanasia is not a recent one. The Oath of Hippocrates is said to have originated in approximately the fifth century B. The family, friends or even foes of someone that elects to exercise their "right to die"? It is suggested that a person suffering from an incurable or terminal illness is not complete command of their mental faculties and thereby incapable of such an extraordinary decision.
Surely a degraded mental capacity rules out realistic thinking with regard to survivors. How many "innocent bystanders" also pay the price of euthanasia? Synthesis For Euthanasia Euthanasia occurs in all societies, including those in which it is held to be immoral and illegal. Euthanasia occurs under the guise of secrecy in societies that secrecy is mandatory. The first priority for the care of patients facing severe pain as a result of a terminal illness or chronic condition should be the relief of their pain.
Relieving the patient's psychosocial and other suffering is as important as relieving the patient's pain. Western laws against passive and voluntary euthanasia have slowly been eased, although serious moral and legal questions still exist. Some opponents of euthanasia have feared that the increasing success that doctors have had in transplanting human organs might lead to abuse of the practice of euthanasia.
It is now generally understood, however, that physicians will not violate the rights of the dying donor in order to help preserve the life of the organ recipient. Even though polls indicate most Americans support the right of sick people to end their pain through self-inflicted death, euthanasia is one of the more contentious aspects of the death-with-dignity movement. Slightly more than half of the physicians surveyed in Washington State would approve the legalization of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia under certain circumstances.
A total of physicians completed questionnaires about their attitudes toward euthanasia and assisted suicide. Physician- assisted suicide was described as prescribing medication and providing counseling to patients on overdosing to end their own lives.
Euthanasia was defined as administering an overdose of medication at an ill patient's request. Forty-two percent of physicians indicated that they found euthanasia ethically acceptable under some circumstances.
Fifty-four percent indicated that they believed euthanasia should be legal under certain circumstances. Today, patients are entitled to opt for passive euthanasia; that is, to make free and informed choices to refuse life support. The controversy over active euthanasia, however, is likely to remain intense because of opposition from religious groups and many members of the medical profession. The medical profession has generally been caught in the middle of the social controversies that rage over euthanasia.
Government and religious groups as well as the medical profession itself agree that doctors are not required to use "extraordinary means" to prolong the life of the terminally ill. The Second Chamber of the Dutch Parliment developed and approved the following substantive and procedural guidelines, or "points" for Dutch physicians to consider when practicing or administering Euthanasia: Substantive Guidelines a Euthanasia must be voluntary; the patient's request must be seriously considered and enduring.
Procedural Guidelines e Euthanasia may be performed only by a physician though a nurse may assist the physician. Having choices, including having the legal right for help to die is what's important in preserving the basic democratic fabric of the United States of America. The issue of euthanasia is, by it's very nature, a very difficult and private choice. Euthanasia should remain exactly that; a choice; a choice that ought not be legislated or restricted by opposing forces or opinions.
Helping terminally ill, or "quick fix" for intolerant society? Copyright c Microsoft Corporation. Kevorkian obscures critical issues - and dangers. Shapiro il v U. Euthanasia Essay, term paper, research paper: Euthanasia See all college papers and term papers on Euthanasia.
- Euthanasia in this paper is examined in those countries which have legalized the procedure. And is found to be more of a burden than a blessing, indicating from the Dutch experience that it becomes an uncontrollable force once it has been legalized.
Research Paper Euthanasia: Life vs. Death The word euthanasia is of Greek origin, which literally translates to mean happy or good death. However, since the beginning of the 19th century, euthanasia has become associated with speeding up the process of .
Euthanasia is often confused with and associated with assisted suicide, definitions of the two are required. Two perspectives shall be presented in this paper. The first perspective will favor euthanasia or the "right to die," the second perspective will favor antieuthanasia, or the "right to live". Euthanasia Euthanasia research papers examine the issue of a person's right to die. This is a topic suggestion on Euthanasia from Paper Masters. Use this topic or order a custom research paper, .
Free Term Papers on Euthanasia available at ggetlava.cf, the largest free term paper community. However, I would like to support euthanasia and, with the help of this paper, to argue in favor of it. Euthanasia is “a deliberate intervention undertaken with the express intention of ending a life so as to relieve intractable suffering” (House of Lords, 12).